Some of the content does need to brought to light (though this obviously isn't so clear cut as certain things), I guess, and my inference that Sengoku Rance is against pedophilia could be wrong. Sengoku Rance, from my point of view, is in no way pedo-pandering, at all, so that argument can be dropped IN MY OPINION. It still feels weird to even so much as in any way imply that Sengoku Rance of all things is guilty of pedo-pandering). Seriously, it's a two sentence summary and that needs to be one of the two sentences? When half a persons character in a h-game is "They look like a child" I start seeing flashing lights everywhere for some reason. Incidentally, did some thinking and it DOES have underaged (visual only, naturally - claimed age, no) characters with explicit rape h-scenes - Daidouji ( (whoops, my bracket redirected the link elsewhere, sorry about that!) (tagged as loli, incidentally) and Kojika (Uh "20 year old girl who looks like a child"? Yeah, okay. I really did try to keep an open mind, and every time it got better it only got two times worse later on.
#Sengoku rance strategy serial#
I was mislead into thinking that the protagonist would get better (my only knowledge being that apparently it was about a very popular strategy game, about a serial rapist and the look up the diviners skirt / rape her screenshot before playing the game) and played through it. I assumed you were referring to Rance but making a typo. From what I understand consent is either there or it is not, so I'd appreciate being enlightened here. What, uh, exactly do you mean by "semi-consensual"? I've googled the term and I can't make sense of it. Me choosing to perceive it as being poor quality or making random assumptions as to the intent of the author is worth precisely nothing, so kindly disregard any random baloney I spew about that. Of course, this is my interpretation of the work, which doesn't enter into the equation at any level. Suffice to say that I read this as they don't exist because they wouldn't be considered titillating, and, well, I'm sure you can take it from there and that's not the point of this post. Had two paragraphs on this, killed it for being another rant tangent. Unlike every other rape scene, effectively. doesn't appear in either text or CG form.
I think it says something that the one scene in which the protagonist is raped by a male. The term you're looking for is Slippery Slope Fallacy.Īctually, it's more akin to how we treat Porn, rather than Pedophilia.īut the difference with those works and Sengoku Rance is that the rape in those works is more about the old views on the "rights" men had concerning "their woman". The fantasy is for the women who is being "ravished", not for the man doing the "ravishing", like it would likely be for Sengoku Rance if you looked at its plot only. RE: Romance novels: From what I understand, those are aimed at women.
In fact, from what I've been hearing about Sengoku Rance, if the main character had been in one of those works, he likely would have been a villain.Īlso, nowadays you wouldn't be able to get away with the levels of Unfortunate Implications about women and their consent that those works showed in the past.ĮDIT. But Snow White, Sleeping Beauty, James Bond and Gone with the Wind are not on the same level of Sengoku Rance, where rape is concerned.